Subject: Re: Site Trolling..
Date: 08/15/07 2:41 pm
I just wanted to say thanks for having checked out the site, even if only in a trolling fashion - it all adds up :)
I'd like to clarify on a couple of areas though, so you may understand the position of MRA's as oppose making assumptions based on ... no experience whatsoever.
Let's see, to start with - 'anti misandry' should perhaps be explained:
anti- is to be against something.
misandry- is the hatred of men.
antimisandry is to be against the hatred of men (e.g. typical feminists, media's portrayal of men in adverts & films, promoting sexual assault (groin kicks) as being funny when it is indeed not funny) etc.
Many areas are covered, the above being just a couple of obvious sections that men face.
I actually agree with, I think it was Jim Sharpe's post, saying that it's a pity we can't all get along and just be friends. However, feminists began this problem and have been working at instilling hatred for common man since they rose to power back in the 60s. This site only reacts to hatred upon men, unlike feminists we do NOT condone violence upon others, child abuse, parental alienation, false accusations, etc. We simply want to undo some of the damage that feminism has caused to society.
Through lies & misinformation, feminism has caused immense problems for men, women and children, families, governments & society itself.
For example, we all know it was 'ages' before women could vote, right?
How true is that?
Women complained at the government and one woman died by throwing her self in front of the King's carriage. They got the vote.
Men, on the other hand, went to war. Those who did not go to war were presented with a white feather to label them as cowards and socially unacceptable people. Yes, it was women (especially feminists) who were handing out the white feathers... that translates to a simple point: Men were shamed by women to fight for them, to defend the women folk.
How long between men & women getting the vote? Only ten years... that's all. And yet, when we are informed of the vote issue by women and feminists, we're only told it was 'ages', and we're left to assume hundreds, thousands of years. But the truth is, it cost men thousands of lives & injuries to get the vote - it cost women a bit of hot air and one attention seeking suicide.
Makes you wonder what else you've been lied to about, doesn't it?
There's a lot, lot more information available for those who actually want to learn the truth behind the claims.
Did you know that domestic violence is initiated at a 50/50 ratio between men & women? But that can't be true - the television & papers only ever talk about how 1 in 4 women is attacked... but the facts are there for people who will open their eyes up and seek that information.
Feminists rely on our unwillingness to seek beyond what they teach.
Did you know the vast majority of child & elder abuse is committed by women, not fathers? No, you didn't? Gee, I wonder why? But it's true. Look it up for yourself and you will discover a world of lies & misinformation.
Unlike feminist boards, antimisandry.com and other groups allow - even invite - feminists to openly discuss in the forums, yet they refuse to allow mens rights advocates to talk in their forum... let's not even joke that they may invite MRA's along. They simply silence us - I speak with experience. Why the double standard? Because this is the nature of men & feminists.. Men want to discuss and find a common ground - feminists don't.
Did you know Erin Pizzey (founder of the women's shelters) herself received death threats because she spoke out against feminism? I've yet to hear of a case where anyone at all has received death threats from a MRA groups because someone didn't agree with them. Did you know R Guelles researched domestic violence for feminist groups. They intentionally made phone calls during day time hours (a] they knew most men would be out, b] most men couldn't be included in the statistics) hence the extreme numbers of women claiming victimhood, and the feminists were all over them - they couldn't get enough of Guelles and his team.. this guy was superman in their eyes. Yet later, when the same researchers repeated their research (to include men this time), they released their findings and guess what? Feminists turned them away, sabotaged their work and tried repeatedly to discredit their work in every possible way... One of the researchers received a death threat. WoW. Another death threat for someone doing what they think is right.
And on and on it goes.
Nobody need lurk or troll on the site, just sign up (well, you'd have to if you're planning on trolling) and ask the questions. Instead of dealing with generalizations, the members will give you facts that can be cited, not just waffle about 'all women must die' (unlike feminists - read up on the SCUM manifesto if you don't believe me).
Chauvinism is a belief of superiority. This is not what MRA's about... feel welcome to find anywhere on antimisandry.com that asserts male superiority over women. However, again, feminists DO assert superiority over men - not just 'some men'; ALL men. There's a well known male feminist named 'Hugo', and he even asserts female superiority, as does William Bond (though his assertion seems to be based from a sexualised POV in the guise of a political POV).
Many of the statistics feminists rely on are distortions of the reality. For example, the wage gap is discussed by Warren Farrel (A former member of NOW - National Org for Women - aka feminist HQ). He explains that although it exists, it is not as feminists paint it. There are too many factors to account for me to get into it here, but you can view the video here.
Also, women being raped obviously does happen, no one would suggest otherwise. The MRA point is that in studies performed, women who recanted their allegation came close to 50% of all allegations. Feminists, otoh, would have us believe that false allegations only account for 2% of all allegations. This was taken from a study by feminists based on a tiny amount of respondents whereas the MRA's study came from a police study performed by police researchers (i.e. they had no hidden agenda) and from a large population study, and more importantly - the women who recanted their allegations KNEW they would face charges IF they recanted.
As I said.. the list goes on and on...
Really folks, take your blinkers off - and instead of listening to feminists - do your own research.
If you can't add to the debate, show the world how intelligent you are by relying on insults only.
[ Reply with quote ]